Google sells its soul for access to China

Congress invites Google – Questions arise over allowing censorship in China

Google had 2 choices: Stick to the moral high ground and keep their services outside of China, or give the Chinese government what they want (the ability to control information) and gain access to one of the worlds fastest developing economies. On their corporate blog, Andrew McLaughlin rationalizes the decision. Google claims that while outside of China Google’s service level within China was poor. However, poor as it may have been, the people of China (when able to get through) would have gotten the results the rest of us would. Now they can’t see those results if they run afoul of a government censor. The problem with the argument is that while Google will be more accessible now, the information will not. By enabling censorship Google is actively assisting the Chinese government in the repression of their own people.

Law expert says Bush broke the law

Wired News: Lawbreaker in Chief

I found this article oddly enough when I saw Jennifer Granick’s blog on Stepto’s blogroll. Granick, if you haven’t heard of her, is a lawyer who has represented several high-profile clients in a range of information security & privacy cases. She is also the executive director of the Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society, and teaches the Cyberlaw Clinic. In addition to the above linked article, Granick has written several responses to critics in her blog in addition to an excellent follow-up article in Wired. I tend to agree with her assessment that Bush clearly broke the law. I hope that there are at least some political consequences for his actions.

House trims PATRIOT extension to 1 month

CNN.com – Patriot Act gets one-month extension – Dec 22, 2005

While to many this may seem as though the House is giving the bill less of a chance than the Senate, the truth is more insidious. A one-month extension won’t be enough to effect any real change and the administration will again be able to resume their strong-arm tactics to force a vote on making the current provisions permanent. Sickening.